Miss Lavina Choie1
1University Of Otago, , Aotearoa / New Zealand
Biography:
Lavina enjoys exploring the different connotations surrounding the ethical issues of dental care and legislation. Lavina's perspectives are from clinical observations with the hope to improve healthcare in this world.
Abstract:
Children who try to refuse dental treatment get overruled by legislation mandating their parents/guardians to give consent on their behalf. However, the consequence of this is that it oppresses the child’s autonomy which could cause future problems. This essay explores whether children should be allowed to refuse dental treatment and the implications of this. The main problem seems to be the ethical issue of what is considered a child? Numerous literature and legislation exist around children consenting to dental treatment however, there is very little on the connotations surrounding children refusing dental treatment. Although children are considered minors by many, in some instances there are discrepancies about the legislative definition of a child based on their age, and physical and mental maturity being inconsistent with reality due to social factors and cognitive development. Concern will be raised about mental conditions as well as advanced cognitive development of children. The social norm will be challenged. Different international legislation regarding this topic will be discussed and concerns for why change is needed. It is anticipated that the perspective of children refusing dental treatment is explored more around the social and cognitive factors so that future attitudes are more positive towards their dental experience. A child’s positive dental experience equates to a confident smiling child.